Ambassador Ódor and Hungary’s Contempt for Human Rights: Making Excuses Instead of Amends

Hungary’s ambassador to Canada, Bálint Ódor,  sent letters to the editor to various Canadian news outlets, in which he attempted to whitewash the shockingly vicious actions of his xenophobic government against Syrian refugees and blamed the media and other EU member states for the crisis. Here is a response from Professor Stevan Harnad:

The Ódor excuses are rank and all-too-familiar attempts to put a sanctimonious spin on the calculating and anti-social malfeasances of the Hungarian government.

Blaming the EU and the media for bearing witness to the Hungarian government’s heartless and reckless mistreatment of the refugees — instead of owning up to it and remedying it — is a signature tactic of this scruple-free regime.

Overwhelmed by an unexpected crisis not of their making?

The months of advance preparation in the form of a concerted nation-wide hate-campaign against migrants and the fortune spent on hastily building a makeshift razor fence whose only bloody victims were migrant wildlife — was that all done sleep-walking?

So that now, being caught unawares by a humanitarian catastrophe — with no government provisions whatsoever for feeding, sheltering, reassuring and registering growing numbers of exhausted men, women and children, not even a public address system that can tell the bewildered and frightened victims in their own language what is happening and what lies in store for them — was the only possible option under the circumstances?

The victims — repeatedly called “economic migrants” and not refugees in the Hungarian government’s lengthy advance propaganda campaign against them, well before they even arrived — are right now detained for days outdoors by police cordons in the rapidly dropping temperatures, with the only food, water, tents, medical aid and information being provided for them by individual Hungarian citizens and volunteer organizations, not the Hungarian government, which is busy building hate and fences, along with hastily dispatching its ambassadors with stretched, sanctimonious and legalistic excuses to the rest of the world.

Unable to stop the worldwide media from bearing witness, the only thing the Hungarian government wants to do now is to get the victims herded into refugee camps, out of the public view, where even Amnesty International has been refused admittance.

The Hungarian government reckoned well that (with the help of its own domestic media control) its hate campaign would desensitize and brutalize much of the Hungarian populace (the wonderful volunteer helpers are alas just a small minority).

But perhaps they didn’t reckon with the effect this very graphic glimpse of the Hungarian government M.O. would have on the rest of the world, which, till now, had not been quite ready to believe that the alarm signals about what is going on in Hungary were not exaggerated.

For this entire refugee catastrophe was fomented by the Hungarian government — muscularly resisting the alien hordes, as the defender not only of the sovereign Hungarian nation, but the rest of Europe — fomented for three reasons that have nothing to do with the crisis in the middle east, the vast numbers of resulting refugees invading “Christian Europe,” or the threat of terrorism:

The plight of the refugees was simply stoked in every way by the Hungarian government in order to divert domestic press attention from mounting government corruption scandals (so far just minor mysteries to the world press) that could threaten the government’s electoral base. A muscular stance, resisting the alien hordes, in contrast, wins Hungarian votes.

But, just as an insurance policy, the primary reason for fomenting the refugee crisis was to provide a pretext for introducing new police-state laws that will be adopted September 15, but will last long past the refugee crisis — laws that will allow warrantless entry into homes on suspicion of harbouring refugees, lengthy prison sentences if found guilty. (The current PM’s arch-rival, the former PM, could immediately be imprisoned as he has been sheltering an average of a dozen refugees every night since the crisis began, as well as feeding them and providing medical care. The current PM has been seeking — so far in vain, because the Hungarian judicial system is not yet 100% under his control — a pretext for imprisoning the former PM.

Princeton University’s renowned constitutional-law expert, Professor Kim Lane Scheppele, who has been studying and warning about the Hungarian government’s abuse of its 2/3 majority to adopt an undemocratic constitution has written an extremely sobering analysis of what the latest piece of legislation portends.

In a police state, there would no longer be any need to fear being voted out of power…

Stevan Harnad

Stevan Harnad is Canada Research Chair in Cognitive Sciences at Université du Québec à Montréal; Professor of Electronics and Computer Science at University of Southampton, UK; External Member of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and on the Board of Directors of the Canadian-Hungarian Democratic Charter.

12 Comments

  1. Charlie London says:

    Stevan?

    You do not help your case when you accuse Orban of something he could never do and would never do.

    You seem to want to reap the dividend of Orban doing it – before he’s even done it – and that is to imprison Gyurcsány.

    He hasn’t and he won’t.

    Isn’t there enough to hang Orban without accusing the thug of something he hasn’t – and won’t do?

    Stick to reality – you have enough on the charge sheet without fabricating evidence.

    Please?

    • Charlie London says:

      ……and before you ‘educate’ me about how Orban has been out to ‘get’ Gy, without success, we know that too.

      Orban is mendacious and Machiavellian too – but something as naively political as to imprison Gy for taking in refugees is not in his opus.

  2. Dear Steven!
    Towards the end of third line of the paragraph underneath the large photo in the middle of the post the word’referees’ should be ‘refugees’ I believe. Perhaps you could correct that before some hostile troll takes advantage of it for his dishonorable purposes. 🙂

  3. Thanks @JGrant. I must have peer review on my mind! I will have to ask Chris to correct it as I have no control.

  4. @Charlie London — Of course I know that Orban would be far too canny to risk imprisoning his rival for something as potentially incendiary as harbouring refugees. But the police-state laws planned for September 15 would make it technically possible to do that. Now use your imagination and contemplate the ramifications of that sort of power across the entire population. (Now would you mind explaining to me what “my case” is and what “dividends” I am trying to “reap”? “fabricating evidence”…?)

    • Charlie London says:

      ‘Technically’ possible applies to anything Orban does.

      You know what I mean – you are over-egging the pudding.

      Apparently the legal facility may now have been withdrawn.

      If so QED

      • Charlie London says:

        ……and I prefer to read responsible dialogue on here.

        I’ll use my imagination at my choosing – not when patronisingly told to do so.

  5. THE PEACOCK TWO-STEP

    Many thanks to Tappanch (on Hungarian Spectrum) for the information that Orban has back-pedalled on the warrantless search clause of the forthcoming September 15 make-a-law.
    http://www.atv.hu/belfold/20150909-menekultugy-varatlanul-visszakozott-a-kormany

    It is of course the usual Orbanian peacock-dance: two steps forward, one step back. It’s the way he has steadily eroded all laws not to his liking, as well as press freedom, judicial independence, private property, free markets, etc. — all freely interlaced with bogus criminal charges and smear campaigns against opponents, pursued while they are needed to create a diversion, or for a hate-campaign, and then dropped much later with neither apology or acknowledgement, once they’ve done their damage.

    The next step is to sneak warrantless search back in again later, under another pretext, in another context, together with some other attention-getting outrage that Orban will then likewise prominently mitigate (provisionally) while the warrantless search power slips through, eclipsed.

    Orban likes to have the technical legislation on the books, so he can document how meticulously he sticks to the letter of the law (which he re-wrote yesterday).

  6. Charlie London says:

    My contacts in Hungary are legal eagles too.

  7. How can Odor look his own family and children in the eye when he publishes bald-face lies about a human tragedy unfolding in his disgusting, wretched little country? The Orban government is scum, and so are all of its diplomats, who work to uphold a nazi system at the heart of Europe.

  8. SIC DUO FACIUNT ITEM

    @Sean Turner: I used to think that the difference between Fidesz and Jobbik when they both advocated the same ugly thing was that the Jobbik yobs were just viscerally bigoted brutes whereas the Fidesz zombies were, rather, anything-goes criminals.

    I still think that’s true, but there’s always been something exalted (in the Hungarian sense of exaltált) about Orban: he may put on a mask opportunistically at first, as appearances demand (the peacock two-step), but sometimes he really gets into it, the way he did with religion, nationalism and now racism:
    http://hungarianspectrum.org/2015/09/09/viktor-orban-reveals-himself-to-be-a-racist/

    Probably megalomania, too, grew on him, with dreams of the Peacock Throne, in the Sandor Palota.

    He doesn’t have Putin’s physique, but he is probably having nocturnal emissions — which I of course mean in the French sense of émissions dramatiques — imagining himself perched uncharacteristically high atop Horthy’s proud caucasian steed or aloft still higher, brandishing Atilla’s sabre, astride the mighty Turul, possibly his true progenitor, soaring over the dominions of his pre-Trianon birthright…

  9. György Lázár says:

    Just imagine a newspaper editor receives Ambassador Ódor’s lengthy explanation… it will reinforce his notion that something is seriously wrong with the Hungarian Government and their diplomats. Letters like these are counterproductive. What was Amb. Ódor thinking?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *